We provide manual and automated QA testing for web, mobile, and OTT products, embedding engineers directly into your sprint cycle to catch bugs before users do.
QA at PettersonApps is not only a phase at the end of a project. Our testers work inside the sprint — reviewing requirements before development starts, writing test cases alongside feature work, and validating builds before they ship. Bugs are found and fixed in the same cycle, not three sprints later.
Your developers are testing their own code. Bugs reach production regularly. Releases are stressful because nobody has systematically tested the full product before deployment. You need a QA engineer who owns quality — so your developers can focus on building.
You run manual regression tests before every release and it takes days. Each release cycle gets slower as the product grows. You need an automation framework that runs in CI/CD, catches regressions in minutes, and scales with the codebase.
You're about to ship a new product, roll out a redesign, or migrate to a new platform. You need a thorough QA pass — functional, cross-device, performance — before real users see it. A one-time deep audit that validates everything works.
You already have a development team from us and want QA included in the sprint cycle. We add a dedicated QA engineer to your team — same tools, same standups, same Jira board. Testing happens within the sprint, not after it.






Quality at every step.
Our testers review requirements and designs before development begins — flagging ambiguity, missing edge cases, and untestable acceptance criteria. By the time the developer opens a pull request, test cases already exist. This prevents bugs instead of just finding them.
Emulators miss real-world problems — touch behavior, network transitions, OS-specific quirks, screen-size edge cases. We maintain a device matrix covering iPhones, Android phones from major manufacturers, iPads, Roku devices, Fire TV sticks, and Smart TVs. Your product is tested the way your users will actually use it.
Automation handles regression and repetitive checks. Manual testing handles exploratory work, usability, and the judgment calls that scripts can't make. We set up both and define clearly which scenarios run automatically and which need human attention — so coverage is high and effort is efficient.
Before you ask.
Need QA for your product?
Tell us about your product, your team, and your current testing gaps. We'll recommend the right QA setup — manual, automated, or both — and have someone ready to start within 1–2 weeks.